🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.